ChatGPT’s latest model, GPT-5.2, has been spotted pulling answers from Elon Musk’s Grokipedia, an AI-generated online encyclopedia created by xAI. The discovery has surprised many in the tech community, especially given the ongoing rivalry between OpenAI and Musk’s AI ventures.
The development has triggered discussions around AI transparency, source reliability, and how large language models decide which information to trust.
Grokipedia Enters ChatGPT’s Source Pool
Grokipedia launched in October 2025 as an AI-driven alternative to Wikipedia. According to Elon Musk, the project was built to counter what he believes are ideological biases in traditional encyclopedias. Unlike Wikipedia, Grokipedia is fully generated by artificial intelligence and does not allow human editing.
Recent testing by multiple publications found that ChatGPT cited Grokipedia several times while answering user queries. These citations appeared across topics such as political structures, historical figures, and academic subjects.
Notably, ChatGPT did not rely on Grokipedia for highly sensitive or widely documented topics. Instead, it appeared more frequently in responses related to niche or lesser-known subjects, where fewer authoritative sources are available online.
Why This Matters
Transparency and Trust
OpenAI states that ChatGPT draws from a wide range of publicly available and licensed data. However, Grokipedia’s AI-only editorial process has raised concerns among researchers and fact-checkers. Without human oversight, errors or biased interpretations may be harder to identify and correct.
Risk of Misinformation
Several studies have questioned Grokipedia’s sourcing standards, noting instances of weak citations and inconsistent references. When AI models reuse content from AI-generated platforms, there is a risk of reinforcing inaccuracies, especially when those sources gain visibility through search indexing.
Blurring Lines Between Rival AI Platforms
Despite public tensions between OpenAI and xAI, this situation highlights how interconnected the AI ecosystem has become. Algorithms do not account for corporate competition. They prioritize relevance, availability, and indexing signals, regardless of who created the content.
What Experts Are Saying
AI researchers point out that modern language models often surface content that is highly indexed or frequently referenced online. If Grokipedia continues to grow in visibility, it may increasingly appear in AI-generated responses.
Some academics warn that AI-generated encyclopedias could redefine how authority is established online, shifting trust from human editorial systems to algorithmic outputs that lack traditional accountability.
What It Means for Users
For users, the takeaway is simple. AI-generated answers should always be verified. Cross-checking important information with trusted sources remains essential, especially when unfamiliar citations appear in responses.
Looking Ahead
As AI systems continue integrating more live web data, questions around source quality, filtering, and accountability will become increasingly important. The emergence of Grokipedia as a referenced source highlights the growing challenge of balancing open information access with accuracy and trust.
Read Next: How to Know If Your Phone Is Being Tracked (10 Warning Signs & Fixes)
Leave a Reply